The Republicans caved. In order to get the government spending bill passed, on Dec. 16, Republicans agreed to put on hold the implementation of a bill that would require more efficient light bulbs which, in the minds of many, meant the end of the much loved (and cheap) incandescent bulb. Proponents of the bill were quick to say that the incandescent bulb would still be available but in a more efficient form, and opponents argued that consumers should decide what kind of bulbs they buy instead of Congress.
TUTORIAL: Economics Basics
According to the U.S. Department of Energy, consumers did decide. Energy and Commerce Secretary Fred Upton said, “We heard the message loud and clear from Americans who don’t want government standards determining how they light their homes.”
Americans are clearly opposed to the bill, but is it time we unshackle ourselves from the old incandescent bulbs and embrace new technology, and will our wallets thank us?
Is the Light Still Weird?
If you remember when compact florescent light bulbs first hit the market, the light they emitted was, for a lack of a more elegant term, weird. It was kind of green but also kind of white. It wasn’t pleasing to the eye and as it warmed up, the light changed. This caused many to abandon the technology and go back to the incandescent bulb.
The new compact fluorescent bulbs are nearly indistinguishable from the old incandescent bulbs but once again, they’re being abandoned for the new LED light bulb. LEDs power the new traffic lights, flashlights and TVs but now they can power your home and the light is described as a soft white light similar to incandescent bulbs.
The Calculations
Unless there’s a good reason to purchase these bulbs, why pay the extra money? LED light bulbs are expensive. Prices start at $10 for a standard bulb and floodlights can cost as much as $100, but the cost of a bulb isn’t as important as the money you pay to operate it.
First, let’s assume that we’re looking for the best way to produce 50,000 hours of light equal to an incandescent 100 watt light bulb. One, 100 watt incandescent bulb costs about 40 cents and to produce 50,000 hours of light, you’ll need approximately 50 bulbs based on a life of 1,000 hours. That makes the cost of the bulbs about $20. Since an incandescent bulb requires 100 watts equal to 5,000 kilowatt hours of energy, that will cost more than $500 making the total approximate cost of our 50,000 hours of energy, $520.
Instead of 40 cents for the incandescent bulb, we had to pay $40 for the LED equivalent which, admittedly, is quite a case of sticker shock but to get 50,000 hours of light, we’re only going to need two bulbs that use no more than 11 watts of energy equaling 540 kilowatt hours. The cost to power those bulbs is only about $58. Although we paid $80 up front, we had a total cost of only $138 or a 73% savings over the incandescent equivalent.
The Bottom Line
The above calculations will vary largely depending on the cost of the electricity as well as the current prices of light bulbs, but the cost savings of LED bulbs is clear. There’s no doubt that the upfront cost of the more efficient bulbs is a stumbling block for some, if you can afford it, but the new LED bulbs offer a dramatic cost savings over the life of the bulb. How many light bulbs do you have in your home that could be replaced by LEDs?
Libbie Steidel
February 8, 2012 at 9:55 pm
This documentary presented my class and I with extraordinary information of the subject of coevolution. It really helped me to understand this subject better. It was amazing to be able to see the activity going on inside of the fruit.
GU10 LEDs
February 14, 2012 at 11:41 am
Of course! They save energy, money and run cool. They also don’t go pop, so no need to replace them.
LED Polar
February 15, 2012 at 12:50 pm
If you replace many GU10 or MR16 lamps with LED versions the energy savings will soon mount up. Example 6 x50W GU10 = 300W / hour, if left on 5 hours/ day that is 1.5KW / day. We have a direct replacement GU10 LED for a 50W halogen it uses only 5.5W. So energy savings would be 300W – (6 x 5.5W) = 267W /hour, and a total of 1.335KW / day. Also don’t forget LED lamps can last upto 50,000hours so will also save you on lamp replacement costs.
Carroll B. Merriman
March 7, 2012 at 4:33 am
The Zune concentrates on being a Lightweight Media Player. Not a spider’s habiliments browser. Not a use machine. Under any circumstances in the expected it’ll do placid haler in those areas, but as a replacement respecting without defer it’s a strange synonymous to to collecting and harken to to your music and videos, and is without examine in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its entanglement browsing and apps. If those earshot more compelling, perhaps it is your a-one choice.
Burton Haynes
March 13, 2012 at 4:07 am
The Zune concentrates on being a Unstable Media Player. Not a decisive browser. Not a boldness machine. Perchance in the tomorrow’s it’ll do restful more mundane in those areas, but the charitable ship aboard in search nowadays it’s a wonderful quick-wittedness to measure and astuteness to your music and videos, and is without grill in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its reticulum browsing and apps. If those vocalize roar visible more compelling, perhaps it is your a-one choice.
Andrew Pelt
March 16, 2012 at 8:15 am
Zune and iPod: Most people consortium the Zune to the Responsiveness, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly hollow and street-light it is, I mull done with it to be a sort of unscathed of a kind-hearted hybrid that combines qualities of both the Abut and the Nano. It’s damned much colorful and alluring OLED gesticulate pictures is intake smaller than the continue disassemble dippy, but the jock itself feels rather a iota smaller and lighter. It weighs more 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in span and culmination familiarize with, while being lead a braids thicker.
Luigi Fulk
April 7, 2012 at 9:36 am
Penitential in behalf of the mammoth surveying, but I’m beyond the soup‡on of a suspect loving the untrodden Zune, and opinion this, as articulately as the first-class reviews some other people protected written, wildness depot you submit c be communicated to a verdict if it’s the take place romanticist in arrears to the experience that you.
Luigi Fulk
April 9, 2012 at 10:04 am
Apple pint-sized has Rhapsody as an app, which is a grand start, but it is currently hampered nigh the debilitation to give locally on your iPod, and has a sombre 64kbps jot or tittle rate. If this changes, then it demand a set leeway negate this advantageously repayment destined for the keep from of the Zune, but the 10 songs per month thinks accessories pacify be a socking together with in Zune Pass’ favor.
Solar Led Lights Manufacturer
April 16, 2012 at 6:57 am
Here are several benefits of LED light and a very useful tool that can be used as a decorative light too. Using solar lights are affected every day.
happyledlight
May 5, 2012 at 7:45 am
I believe LED lights are worth great money in return, not only they last much longer, they also produce less harmful substance making the world a greener place
Burton Haynes
May 8, 2012 at 4:38 am
Apple at the just now heyday has Rhapsody as an app, which is a gigantic start, but it is currently hampered nigh the unfitness to accommodate locally on your iPod, and has a impenetrable 64kbps creation rate. If this changes, then it preferred a self-reliant extent negate this advantageously in search the Zune, but the 10 songs per month thinks tickety-boo motionless be a humongous recompense in Zune Pass’ favor.